November 3, 20268 min read7 sections
B2B Influencer Marketing Statistics 2026: 46 Numbers With Sources
By Fame Team
Key Takeaways
- 82% of B2B marketers say creators increase credibility with decision-makers (LinkedIn, 2026).
- 93% of marketers rate their programmes effective, but only 46% say very effective (TopRank, 2026).
- Very effective programmes are far more likely to run always-on work: 72% vs 27% (TopRank, 2026).
- Most of these figures are self-reported and come from vendors, so use them for framing rather than forecasting.
The strongest recent numbers say B2B marketers now treat influencers as a credibility channel: 82% of B2B marketers in LinkedIn's 2026 outlook say creators increase credibility with decision-makers, while 93% of marketers in TopRank's latest survey rate their programmes effective but only 46% rate them very effective. This page lists 46 numbers. We opened the publisher's own page or PDF for each one, and each row gives the source and year.
Almost all of this is self-reported opinion, and much of it comes from companies with something to sell. LinkedIn sells creator tools, TopRank and Ogilvy sell influencer services, and so do we. Use these figures to frame a decision, not to forecast your own results. For that, read our guides to measuring B2B influencer marketing ROI and what B2B influencer marketing costs.
Trust and credibility
LinkedIn's figures come from a YouGov online survey of 1,299 B2B marketers at middle management level or above in the USA, UK, France, Germany and India, with fieldwork from 14 January to 5 February 2026. The link goes to LinkedIn's announcement, which reports the outlook's figures and methodology.
| Number | What it measures | Source and year |
|---|---|---|
| 82% | B2B marketers who say creators increase credibility with decision-makers | LinkedIn, Global B2B Marketing Outlook, 2026 |
| 83% | B2B marketers who say credibility matters more than traditional brand messaging | LinkedIn, Global B2B Marketing Outlook, 2026 |
| 77% | B2B marketers who say buyers need to trust and know a brand before they will engage | LinkedIn, Global B2B Marketing Outlook, 2026 |
| 70% | Marketers who say buyers rely more on peer voices and experts than on brand-produced content | LinkedIn, Global B2B Marketing Outlook, 2026 |
| 56% | B2B buyers said to depend on creator input in the last stage of buying. LinkedIn words this as a buyer figure, but the survey it footnotes sampled marketers, so read it as a reported view | LinkedIn, Global B2B Marketing Outlook, 2026 |
| 81% | B2B CMOs who agree their organisation needs to deliver in new ways | LinkedIn, Global B2B Marketing Outlook, 2026 |
Adoption and effectiveness in 2026
TopRank surveyed 424 manager-level and above B2B marketers at US companies with 100 or more employees, from mid-May to mid-June 2026. The publisher labels this its 2027 report, which is why it can look newer than its fieldwork. The sample is US only, so treat it with care if you sell mainly elsewhere.
| Number | What it measures | Source and year |
|---|---|---|
| 93% | Marketers who rate their influencer programmes effective | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 46% | Marketers who rate their programmes very effective | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 46% vs 30% | Marketers citing trustworthiness versus audience size when selecting partners | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 44% | Brands partnering with content creators who have large professional audiences | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 42% | Brands partnering with customer advocates | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 72% vs 27% | Always-on engagement: very effective programmes versus the rest | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 73% vs 22% | Fully documented strategy: very effective programmes versus the rest | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 86% | Marketers who say improving generative AI visibility will be at least moderately important this year | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 21% | Marketers who have made AI visibility a primary goal of their influencer programme | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 37% | Marketers who have connected influencer work to AI search optimisation | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 48% vs 26% | Brand cited in AI answers: marketers who connect influence to AI search versus those who do not | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
| 68% vs 43% | Very confident justifying influencer budget to a CFO: the same two groups | TopRank Marketing and Ascend2, fifth edition, published October 2026 |
Budgets, challenges and operations
These come from TopRank's previous edition. Respondents could give several answers to most questions, so the percentages do not add up to 100. Finding partners and measuring results were the two biggest challenges, which is why we wrote separate guides on how to find B2B influencers on LinkedIn and how to brief a LinkedIn creator.
| Number | What it measures | Source and year |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Marketers reporting outstanding results from their influencer programmes | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 58% | B2B marketing teams using an always-on approach | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 53% | Marketers whose dedicated influencer budget is growing | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 48% | Marketers naming identifying, qualifying and connecting with influencers as a top challenge | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 47% | Marketers naming measuring and reporting results as a top challenge | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 56% | Marketers naming social media posts as the most effective influencer content type | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 52% | Marketers who find influencers through social media searches | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 50% | Marketers who find influencers through recommendations from trusted sources | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 53% | Marketers using performance-based compensation | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
| 6% | Marketers not compensating influencers at all | TopRank Marketing, 2025 report |
The global picture
Ogilvy's research surveyed 550+ senior marketing leaders through Opinium and was published in September 2023, with LinkedIn and Onalytica as partners. It is older than the rest of this page but remains one of the few surveys with a multi-country sample. The 1% figure deserves particular scepticism, as marketers tend to be generous about programmes they run themselves.
| Number | What it measures | Source and year |
|---|---|---|
| 75% | B2B businesses already using influencer marketing | Ogilvy and Opinium, Influencing Business, 2023 |
| 93% | Of those users, the share planning to increase their use | Ogilvy and Opinium, Influencing Business, 2023 |
| 67% | Respondents saying influencer campaigns had more impact than brand-only marketing | Ogilvy and Opinium, Influencing Business, 2023 |
| 77% | Respondents expecting influencer campaigns to outperform brand-only marketing in the near future | Ogilvy and Opinium, Influencing Business, 2023 |
| 1% | Businesses saying influencer campaigns performed worse than their brand content | Ogilvy and Opinium, Influencing Business, 2023 |
| 40% | Marketers citing warmer leads, more leads or more sales as success factors they experienced | Ogilvy and Opinium, Influencing Business, 2023 |
| 49% | C-suite marketers who say influencers give the brand a more credible opinion than it can achieve alone | Ogilvy and Opinium, Influencing Business, 2023 |
| 92% | Participants who agree influencers are effective for hyper-targeted marketing or personalised messaging | Ogilvy and Opinium, Influencing Business, 2023 |
Creative performance on LinkedIn
The Credibility Code is the most useful source here because it goes beyond opinion, although samples are small in places. It draws on AI-powered creative testing of 113 creator-led ads, LinkedIn campaign data from 36 creator-led ads, and an analysis of about 11,000 creator Thought Leader Ads from September to December 2025. Ipsos dated its page 31 July 2026. The first three rows are survey figures that LinkedIn cites from its earlier research.
| Number | What it measures | Source and year |
|---|---|---|
| 82% | B2B buyers who say creator content influences purchasing decisions (footnoted to LinkedIn and GWI, 2024) | LinkedIn B2B Institute and Ipsos, The Credibility Code, 2026 |
| 94% | B2B marketers who say trust is key to success (footnoted to the LinkedIn and Ipsos 2025 benchmark) | LinkedIn B2B Institute and Ipsos, The Credibility Code, 2026 |
| 45% | Share who actually trust the vendors they engage with (same footnote) | LinkedIn B2B Institute and Ipsos, The Credibility Code, 2026 |
| 8.6x | Click-through rate of 36 tested creator-led ads against the LinkedIn video ad benchmark | LinkedIn B2B Institute and Ipsos, The Credibility Code, 2026 |
| 4.2x | Engagement rate of the same ads against the benchmark | LinkedIn B2B Institute and Ipsos, The Credibility Code, 2026 |
| +30% | Predicted brand impact of the same ads against the Ipsos short-form video average. This is a model prediction, not a measured outcome | LinkedIn B2B Institute and Ipsos, The Credibility Code, 2026 |
| +52% | Median engagement uplift for creator Thought Leader Ads that feel user-generated versus highly polished ones | LinkedIn B2B Institute and Ipsos, The Credibility Code, 2026 |
| +43% | Median engagement uplift for creator Thought Leader Ads with a clear point of view versus simple announcements | LinkedIn B2B Institute and Ipsos, The Credibility Code, 2026 |
Note what the 8.6x does and does not show. It compares a selected set of creator-led ads with a general video benchmark, so it does not prove that a new campaign would match it.
Thought Leader Ads
LinkedIn says these figures come from a select group of early pilot testers between 8 February and 25 April 2023, may be affected by early adopter bias, and are directional. For how the format works, see our LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads guide.
| Number | What it measures | Source and year |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7x | Click-through rate of Thought Leader Ads versus other single-image campaigns | LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads product sheet, pilot data from 2023 |
| 1.6x | Engagement rate on the same comparison | LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads product sheet, pilot data from 2023 |
What the numbers mean for your plan
- Adoption is no longer the question. The useful gap is between effective and very effective programmes, and it lines up with documented strategy and always-on work.
- Choosing partners on trust beats choosing on reach, according to what marketers report. Follower counts alone will not get you there.
- Measurement remains a weak spot, so agree your reporting before you spend. Named engagers and cost per thousand impressions are easier to defend than likes.
- Be careful with comparisons between groups. Very effective programmes doing something more often does not prove that the activity caused the success.
Fame has not published its own campaign benchmarks yet, so none appear here. To see how we run sponsored posts on vetted LinkedIn creators' profiles, see Fame Influencer pricing, or look up unfamiliar terms in the influencer marketing glossary. For the wider method, start with our complete guide to B2B influencer marketing and LinkedIn influencer marketing playbook. To see campaigns in practice, read our B2B influencer marketing examples.
If you are ready to choose a route, compare LinkedIn Creator Marketplace and agencies, or browse the best B2B influencer marketing agencies and best LinkedIn influencer marketing agencies. Fame's own options include our LinkedIn influencer marketing agency service, influencer marketing for SaaS companies and our vetted creators. Our published sponsored post examples are founder Tom Hunt's own posts, not roster results.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ogilvy's 2023 global research put it at 75% of B2B businesses. It is the broadest dated figure on this page, though it is now three years old.
Marketers report that it does: 93% in TopRank's 2026 survey rate their programmes effective. That is self-reported, and only 46% say very effective, so results depend heavily on how the programme is run.
Prefer figures with a stated sample, dates and method, such as LinkedIn's YouGov survey and TopRank's survey of 424 marketers. Check who published the research and what they sell.
Not yet, so this page includes none. Reports for Fame Influencer clients cover named engagers, ICP engagement and blended CPM against LinkedIn Ads benchmarks.
Want us to run this for you?
Fame starts and grows B2B podcasts that generate pipeline. Tell us who you are trying to reach and we will send a costed proposal within 1 working day.
Related content
- Read moreJuly 18, 2025
Amplifying B2B Podcast Content: Influencer And Strategic Association Playbook
Here's the uncomfortable truth: Your podcast's reach isn't limited by your content quality or production value. - Read moreNovember 14, 2024
8 Reasons Why We're Bullish On The Creator Economy
Traditionally large publishers of the world were the media (radio, newspaper, TV). As the Internet developed, social media started to be the point of truth for many people around… - Read moreJuly 26, 2024
How To Leverage Influencer Marketing For Your B2B Podcast
You’ve launched your B2B podcast , secured a few stellar guests, and even got some early episodes under your belt. - Read moreNovember 3, 2026
The 15 Best B2B Influencer Marketing Agencies in 2026
The best B2B influencer marketing agency for most B2B tech teams is one that can show who engaged, not just how many saw the post.